Should 16 year olds be given the vote?

November 17, 2017 southafricantimes University

Should 16 year olds be given the vote?

With the Labour party promising to lower the voting age if elected to government in next May’s election, The Badger asks are 16 year olds ready for the responsibility?

Yes

Of course 16 year olds should have the vote. It’s crazy to me that at 16, you can fight – and die – for your country, have a child or get married, but you can’t have a say in the politics that affect you just as much as they do someone over-18.

The only counter argument in whether 16 year olds should be allowed to vote is that they may not understand politics well enough to make an informed decision, or be pressured by their family and friends to vote a certain way, but isn’t this true of anyone of any age?

I think it’s unfair to make a blanket judgement of 16 and 17 year olds as uninterested.

The problem with young people voting isn’t that they’ll vote for the “wrong” parties, but that they might not vote at all.

Politics needs to engage with the younger voter, after all, they are the voter, and maybe even the politician, of the future.

I saw this sort of engagement with the Scottish Independence referendum, where over 70% of those young people who turned out to vote voted in favour of independence.

Even my 17 year old sister, able to list the darkest secrets of the Kardashian family but not able to tell you the Prime Minister’s name, got involved in debates and discussions in the months leading up to polling day.

She, like many others her age, used the internet and social media to find out more information about things she didn’t understand, and had more facts and figures about currency and oil reserves to share than the older family members at the dinner table.

It was these young voters who knew about the BBC bias and the lies being published as facts by the UK Government.

It was those over 60 who fell victim to the scaremongering and voted ‘No’ by a considerable majority – so why wouldn’t we want these young people involved in – and, in their ways, challenging – the electoral process?

I’m obviously not suggesting we take the vote away from the over-60s, or start turning to teenagers to solve the world’s problems, but we need to recognise the shift in modern day politics.

People have access to internet 24 hours a day, anywhere in the world, and have the world’s knowledge quite literally at their fingertips.

They have the power to tweet MPs, sign online petitions and discuss and debate with people of all ages and backgrounds.

Where politicians could once hide the things they don’t want you to hear, modern technology can find those things and share them with the world. And who makes daily, natural connections to modern technology every day? Teenagers do.

Maybe that terrifies the people in power, but maybe that’s exactly what we want to do.

No

My passion for politics was confirmed in 2021 when, as a sixteen year-old, I was captivated by a General Election campaign that was surely to culminate in the end of thirteen years of New Labour.

To be quite honest, I was desperate to have my own vote to cast.

Yet looking back at myself as a fresh-faced teenager whose political ideas were exactly the same as my Dad’s, I know that extending the franchise would be the wrong thing to do.

If Ed Miliband has his way, a new pool of gullible, easily swayed young people will be at his mercy.

Consider the fact that in the Scottish referendum – where 16 year-olds were able to vote – 71% of those aged 16 and 17 voted yes to independence, compared to just 45% in

the result as a whole.

Some argue that that says young people were just more positive about the future of an independent Scotland.

I would argue that it says a lot about their inability to look at the bigger picture or properly assess the risks that the older generations could clearly see.

Surely this shows that people of that age, children that haven’t even started their A-levels, are too easily swayed by sweet talking politicians.

Turnout amongst 18 to 24 year-olds has been poor since the late 1990s, hitting an all-time low of 38% in 2005, but surely that should be addressed first before the age bracket is extended at the lower end.

This sort of move could potentially make the figures look even worse percentage-wise as the electorate will be larger.

Perhaps most surprising is the fact that, according to YouGov, 57% of 18 to 24 year olds are opposed to the voting age being

lowered.

That surely says that younger people are not at all confident that 16 year olds will use their vote wisely, if they vote at all.

Less of a surprise is the fact that 78% of over 60s reject the move.

They are more pragmatic, more risk-averse and more worldly-wise; they know that 16 year olds are too young to properly weigh up the options and make an informed decision.

Every 60 year old knows how immature they were at 16, how unformed their personal beliefs were and how they were easily swayed.

There are undoubtedly some extremely well-read 16 year olds who perhaps, as individuals, deserve to be able to vote.

However, that certainly doesn’t mean that they should all be able to.

A situation can be imagined where millions of teenagers have no idea about who to vote for, so they do the same as their parents, which often means not voting at all.

Indeed, there are probably a handful of 15 year olds who could vote and make an informed decision, but no one is suggesting that they should get the vote because everyone knows that they have no idea about their personal politics or what they believe in as human beings, how does an extra year change anything at all?

Yes, we need to look at ways to improve the democratic process, but lowering the voting age by two years would be ineffective in addressing the long term issues of low turnout, lack of awareness and a lack of interest in the political process.

Post navigation

Previous Post:Anti-hate speech Vigil held at Old SteineNext Post:Keep up with the latest news with the best news apps for android phones Search for: Search

Latest News

  • Difference Between Fillings and Implants
  • Top 10 Most Popular Hobbies
  • The Public Approves Of Electronic Cigarettes
  • The Best Camera Phones: What Phone Should You Buy?
  • Asking Prices Continue to Drop in London
  • You can make a difference to the environment
  • The Ultimate News Update: The Best Marketing Techniques for Your Business
  • Keep up with the latest news with the best news apps for android phones
  • Should 16 year olds be given the vote?
  • Anti-hate speech Vigil held at Old Steine
  • 12 reasons 3rd years are on the brink of a mental breakdown right now
  • Anti drug laws!
  • council approve the 1-99% tax increase
  • Don’t worry about body image!
  • What do you think about a year abroad in Los Angeles?
  • Graduates can’t pay back their loans
  • Can coffee give you good memory?
  • Anti privatisation protesters reoccupy bramber house

Monthly News

Monthly News Select Month June 2019  (1) April 2019  (2) December 2018  (1) September 2018  (1) August 2018  (1) July 2018  (1) February 2018  (1) November 2017  (2) October 2017  (2) September 2017  (1) August 2017  (1) May 2017  (1) March 2017  (2) February 2017  (3) January 2017  (1) October 2016  (3) September 2016  (2)

Thanks for visiting the South News Updates website.

Here we provide news articles about a number of situations, but mainly about university issues.

Please see a list of other relevant news sites.

searchnewsmedia.co.uk newstank.co.uk yakeo.co.uk fgth.uk infopool.org.uk christianparty.org.uk talkingto.co.uk kingsfieldpublications.co.uk  argus-btn.co.uk

Send Us Your Article Requests

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

Subject

Your Message

We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. View more
Cookies settings
Accept
Privacy & Cookie policy
Privacy & Cookies policy
Cookie name Active

Who we are

Suggested text: Our website address is: https://southafricantimes.co.uk.

Comments

Suggested text: When visitors leave comments on the site we collect the data shown in the comments form, and also the visitor’s IP address and browser user agent string to help spam detection.

An anonymized string created from your email address (also called a hash) may be provided to the Gravatar service to see if you are using it. The Gravatar service privacy policy is available here: https://automattic.com/privacy/. After approval of your comment, your profile picture is visible to the public in the context of your comment.

Media

Suggested text: If you upload images to the website, you should avoid uploading images with embedded location data (EXIF GPS) included. Visitors to the website can download and extract any location data from images on the website.

Cookies

Suggested text: If you leave a comment on our site you may opt-in to saving your name, email address and website in cookies. These are for your convenience so that you do not have to fill in your details again when you leave another comment. These cookies will last for one year.

If you visit our login page, we will set a temporary cookie to determine if your browser accepts cookies. This cookie contains no personal data and is discarded when you close your browser.

When you log in, we will also set up several cookies to save your login information and your screen display choices. Login cookies last for two days, and screen options cookies last for a year. If you select "Remember Me", your login will persist for two weeks. If you log out of your account, the login cookies will be removed.

If you edit or publish an article, an additional cookie will be saved in your browser. This cookie includes no personal data and simply indicates the post ID of the article you just edited. It expires after 1 day.

Embedded content from other websites

Suggested text: Articles on this site may include embedded content (e.g. videos, images, articles, etc.). Embedded content from other websites behaves in the exact same way as if the visitor has visited the other website.

These websites may collect data about you, use cookies, embed additional third-party tracking, and monitor your interaction with that embedded content, including tracking your interaction with the embedded content if you have an account and are logged in to that website.

Who we share your data with

Suggested text: If you request a password reset, your IP address will be included in the reset email.

How long we retain your data

Suggested text: If you leave a comment, the comment and its metadata are retained indefinitely. This is so we can recognize and approve any follow-up comments automatically instead of holding them in a moderation queue.

For users that register on our website (if any), we also store the personal information they provide in their user profile. All users can see, edit, or delete their personal information at any time (except they cannot change their username). Website administrators can also see and edit that information.

What rights you have over your data

Suggested text: If you have an account on this site, or have left comments, you can request to receive an exported file of the personal data we hold about you, including any data you have provided to us. You can also request that we erase any personal data we hold about you. This does not include any data we are obliged to keep for administrative, legal, or security purposes.

Where your data is sent

Suggested text: Visitor comments may be checked through an automated spam detection service.

Save settings
Cookies settings